Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Different Gene Expression Patterns in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast

Molecular Biology of the Cell · 2004 · Vol. 15(6) · pp. 2523–2536
Hongjuan ZhaoAnita LangerødYoungran JiKent W. NowelsJahn M. NeslandRob TibshiraniI. K. BukholmRolf KåresenDavid BotsteinAnne‐Lise Børresen‐DaleStefanie S. Jeffrey

Abstract

Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are the two major histological types of breast cancer worldwide. Whereas IDC incidence has remained stable, ILC is the most rapidly increasing breast cancer phenotype in the United States and Western Europe. It is not clear whether IDC and ILC represent molecularly distinct entities and what genes might be involved in the development of these two phenotypes. We conducted comprehensive gene expression profiling studies to address these questions. Total RNA from 21 ILCs, 38 IDCs, two lymph node metastases, and three normal tissues were amplified and hybridized to approximately 42,000 clone cDNA microarrays. Data were analyzed using hierarchical clustering algorithms and statistical analyses that identify differentially expressed genes (significance analysis of microarrays) and minimal subsets of genes (prediction analysis for microarrays) that succinctly distinguish ILCs and IDCs. Eleven of 21 (52%) of the ILCs ("typical" ILCs) clustered together and displayed different gene expression profiles from IDCs, whereas the other ILCs ("ductal-like" ILCs) were distributed between different IDC subtypes. Many of the differentially expressed genes between ILCs and IDCs code for proteins involved in cell adhesion/motility, lipid/fatty acid transport and metabolism, immune/defense response, and electron transport. Many genes that distinguish typical and ductal-like ILCs are involved in regulation of cell growth and immune response. Our data strongly suggest that over half the ILCs differ from IDCs not only in histological and clinical features but also in global transcription programs. The remaining ILCs closely resemble IDCs in their transcription patterns. Further studies are needed to explore the differences between ILC molecular subtypes and to determine whether they require different therapeutic strategies.

Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationCancer Cells and MetastasisBiologyDuctal carcinomaPhenotypeGene expression profilingBreast cancerGeneDNA microarrayGene expressionMicroarray analysis techniquesMicroarray

MeSH terms

Breast NeoplasmsHumansMiddle AgedRNAGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisGene Expression Profiling

Funding

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Kreftforeningen
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Citations
459
FWCI
9.04
field-weighted impact
References
72
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Nature · 2000 · 16,173 citations
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Nature Genetics · 2000 · 43,975 citations
Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2001 · 10,888 citations
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 1998 · 16,353 citations
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2003 · 5,398 citations
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6,503 citations
An Immunohistochemical Study
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 1989 · 1,919 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.