Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought

Psychological Science · 2002 · Vol. 13(2) · pp. 185–189
Lera BoroditskyMichael Ramscar

Abstract

How are people able to think about things they have never seen or touched? We demonstrate that abstract knowledge can be built analogically from more experience-based knowledge. People's understanding of the abstract domain of time, for example, is so intimately dependent on the more experience-based domain of space that when people make an air journey or wait in a lunch line, they also unwittingly (and dramatically) change their thinking about time. Further, our results suggest that it is not sensorimotor spatial experience per se that influences people's thinking about time, but rather people's representations of and thinking about their spatial experience.

Language, Metaphor, and CognitionCategorization, perception, and languageAction Observation and SynchronizationPsychologyDomain (mathematical analysis)Space (punctuation)Cognitive psychologyEpistemologySocial psychologyCognitive scienceLinguisticsPhilosophy

MeSH terms

AdultAssociation LearningConcept FormationFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionOrientationProblem SolvingSpace PerceptionThinkingTime PerceptionMind-Body Relations, Metaphysical
Citations
878
FWCI
14.93
field-weighted impact
References
15
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Grounded Cognition
Annual Review of Psychology · 2007 · 5,244 citations
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Psychological Review · 2010 · 6,118 citations
Time in the mind: Using space to think about time
Cognition · 2007 · 1,171 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.