review Open AccessTop 1% cited
The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
BMC Health Services Research · 2012 · Vol. 12(1) · pp. 96–96
Edward Duncan✉(University of Stirling)Jennifer Murray(University of Stirling)
Abstract
Whilst the importance of routinely measuring outcomes within the allied health professions is well recognised, it has largely failed to be delivered in practice. Factors that influence clinicians' ability and desire to undertake routine outcome measurement are bi-directional: they can act as either facilitators or barriers. Routine outcome measurement may only be deliverable if appropriate action is taken at individual therapist, team, and organisational levels of an organisation.
Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchNursing Roles and PracticesDelphi Technique in ResearchMedicinePsycINFOSystematic reviewMEDLINEInclusion (mineral)Data extractionCritical appraisalHealth administrationProtocol (science)Nursing
MeSH terms
Administrative PersonnelAllied Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceHumansOrganizational PolicyInformation Storage and RetrievalOutcome Assessment, Health CareBenchmarking
Citations
391
FWCI
31.92
field-weighted impact
References
38
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2010 · 3,272 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
