article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses: Table 1
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2003 · Vol. 57(7) · pp. 527–529
Mark Petticrew✉(MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit)H Roberts(City, University of London)
Abstract
Debate is ongoing about the nature and use of evidence in public health decision making, and there seems to be an emerging consensus that the "hierarchy of evidence" may be difficult to apply in other settings. It may be unhelpful however to simply abandon the hierarchy without having a framework or guide to replace it. One such framework is discussed. This is based around a matrix, and emphasises the need to match research questions to specific types of research. This emphasis on methodological appropriateness, and on typologies rather than hierarchies of evidence may be helpful in organising and appraising public health evidence.
Diverse Educational Innovations StudiesRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchMathematics educationSociologyPsychology
MeSH terms
Decision MakingHumansPolicy MakingPublic HealthPublic PolicyPractice Guidelines as Topic
Funding
- University of Glasgow
- Medical Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
Citations
541
FWCI
64.51
field-weighted impact
References
34
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Socioeconomic Inequality and Caries
Journal of Dental Research · 2014 · 740 citations
Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review
BMC Public Health · 2011 · 756 citations
References
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
JAMA · 1995 · 5,583 citations
Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2002 · 1,040 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
