Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 1998 · Vol. 88(1) · pp. 95–106
M. WithersR. C. AsterChristopher J. YoungJ.I. BeirigerM.D.S. HarrisS.G. MooreJ.R. Trujillo

Abstract

Abstract Digital algorithms for robust detection of phase arrivals in the presence of stationary and nonstationary noise have a long history in seismology and have been exploited primarily to reduce the amount of data recorded by data logging systems to manageable levels. In the present era of inexpensive digital storage, however, such algorithms are increasingly being used to flag signal segments in continuously recorded digital data streams for subsequent processing by automatic and/or expert interpretation systems. In the course of our development of an automated, near-real-time, waveform correlation event-detection and location system (WCEDS), we have surveyed the abilities of such algorithms to enhance seismic phase arrivals in teleseismic data streams. Specifically, we have considered envelopes generated by energy transient (STA/LTA), Z-statistic, frequency transient, and polarization algorithms. The WCEDS system requires a set of input data streams that have a smooth, low-amplitude response to background noise and seismic coda and that contain peaks at times corresponding to phase arrivals. The algorithm used to generate these input streams from raw seismograms must perform well under a wide range of source, path, receiver, and noise scenarios. Present computational capabilities allow the application of considerably more robust algorithms than have been historically used in real time. However, highly complex calculations can still be computationally prohibitive for current workstations when the number of data streams become large. While no algorithm was clearly optimal under all source, receiver, path, and noise conditions tested, an STA/LTA algorithm incorporating adaptive window lengths controlled by nonstationary seismogram spectral characteristics was found to provide an output that best met the requirements of a global correlation-based event-detection and location system.

Seismology and Earthquake StudiesSeismic Waves and AnalysisSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesAlgorithmComputer scienceData stream miningReal-time computingSeismogramWaveformNoise (video)AmplitudeSeismologyData mining
Citations
564
FWCI
4.43
field-weighted impact
References
35
Percentile
95%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification
Geophysical Journal International · 1991 · 3,572 citations
Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 1982 · 662 citations
Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 1978 · 1,272 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection · Scinovex