Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Review: Ecological networks – beyond food webs

Journal of Animal Ecology · 2008 · Vol. 78(1) · pp. 253–269
Thomas C. IngsJosé M. MontoyaJordi BascompteNico BlüthgenLee E. BrownCarsten F. DormannFrançois EdwardsDavid FigueroaUte JacobJ. Iwan JonesRasmus B. LauridsenMark E. LedgerHannah M. LewisJens M. OlesenF. J. Frank van VeenPhil H. WarrenGuy Woodward

Abstract

1. A fundamental goal of ecological network research is to understand how the complexity observed in nature can persist and how this affects ecosystem functioning. This is essential for us to be able to predict, and eventually mitigate, the consequences of increasing environmental perturbations such as habitat loss, climate change, and invasions of exotic species. 2. Ecological networks can be subdivided into three broad types: 'traditional' food webs, mutualistic networks and host-parasitoid networks. There is a recent trend towards cross-comparisons among network types and also to take a more mechanistic, as opposed to phenomenological, perspective. For example, analysis of network configurations, such as compartments, allows us to explore the role of co-evolution in structuring mutualistic networks and host-parasitoid networks, and of body size in food webs. 3. Research into ecological networks has recently undergone a renaissance, leading to the production of a new catalogue of evermore complete, taxonomically resolved, and quantitative data. Novel topological patterns have been unearthed and it is increasingly evident that it is the distribution of interaction strengths and the configuration of complexity, rather than just its magnitude, that governs network stability and structure. 4. Another significant advance is the growing recognition of the importance of individual traits and behaviour: interactions, after all, occur between individuals. The new generation of high-quality networks is now enabling us to move away from describing networks based on species-averaged data and to start exploring patterns based on individuals. Such refinements will enable us to address more general ecological questions relating to foraging theory and the recent metabolic theory of ecology. 5. We conclude by suggesting a number of 'dead ends' and 'fruitful avenues' for future research into ecological networks.

Plant and animal studiesEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEcologyGeographyEcological networkBiologyEcosystem

MeSH terms

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalEcologyBiological EvolutionFood Chain

Funding

  • Sight Research UK
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Citations
931
FWCI
79.70
field-weighted impact
References
187
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Climate change and freshwater ecosystems: impacts across multiple levels of organization
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2010 · 1,277 citations
Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2010 · 1,225 citations
References
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Journal of Animal Ecology · 1980 · 1,811 citations
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Nature · 1998 · 42,581 citations
TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGY
Ecology · 2004 · 7,673 citations
Small World Patterns in Food Webs
Journal of Theoretical Biology · 2002 · 622 citations
Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · 2002 · 2,113 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Review: Ecological networks – beyond food webs · Scinovex