Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models?

Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2001 · Vol. 44(4) · pp. 400–417
Claudia SchützA. Warshel

Abstract

Implicit models for evaluation of electrostatic energies in proteins include dielectric constants that represent effect of the protein environment. Unfortunately, the results obtained by such models are very sensitive to the value used for the dielectric constant. Furthermore, the factors that determine the optimal value of these constants are far from being obvious. This review considers the meaning of the protein dielectric constants and the ways to determine their optimal values. It is pointed out that typical benchmarks for validation of electrostatic models cannot discriminate between consistent and inconsistent models. In particular, the observed pK(a) values of surface groups can be reproduced correctly by models with entirely incorrect physical features. Thus, we introduce a discriminative benchmark that only includes residues whose pK(a) values are shifted significantly from their values in water. We also use the semimacroscopic version of the protein dipole Langevin dipole (PDLD/S) formulation to generate a series of models that move gradually from microscopic to fully macroscopic models. These include the linear response version of the PDLD/S models, Poisson Boltzmann (PB)-type models, and Tanford Kirkwwod (TK)-type models. Using our different models and the discriminative benchmark, we show that the protein dielectric constant, epsilon(p), is not a universal constant but simply a parameter that depends on the model used. It is also shown in agreement with our previous works that epsilon(p) represents the factors that are not considered explicitly. The use of a discriminative benchmark appears to help not only in identifying nonphysical models but also in analyzing effects that are not reproduced in an accurate way by consistent models. These include the effect of water penetration and the effect of the protein reorganization. Finally, we show that the optimal dielectric constant for self-energies is not the optimal constant for charge-charge interactions.

Protein Structure and DynamicsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryDielectricDipoleStatistical physicsBenchmark (surveying)Discriminative modelConstant (computer programming)ElectrostaticsApplied mathematicsChemistryComputer science

MeSH terms

IonsModels, ChemicalProteinsThermodynamicsReproducibility of ResultsStatic Electricity
Citations
940
FWCI
15.04
field-weighted impact
References
100
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Chemical Reviews · 2005 · 16,260 citations
Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pK<sub>a</sub> values
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2005 · 2,031 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? · Scinovex