Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Benchmarking Sets for Molecular Docking

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2006 · Vol. 49(23) · pp. 6789–6801
Niu HuangBrian K. ShoichetJohn J. Irwin

Abstract

Ligand enrichment among top-ranking hits is a key metric of molecular docking. To avoid bias, decoys should resemble ligands physically, so that enrichment is not simply a separation of gross features, yet be chemically distinct from them, so that they are unlikely to be binders. We have assembled a directory of useful decoys (DUD), with 2950 ligands for 40 different targets. Every ligand has 36 decoy molecules that are physically similar but topologically distinct, leading to a database of 98,266 compounds. For most targets, enrichment was at least half a log better with uncorrected databases such as the MDDR than with DUD, evidence of bias in the former. These calculations also allowed 40x40 cross-docking, where the enrichments of each ligand set could be compared for all 40 targets, enabling a specificity metric for the docking screens. DUD is freely available online as a benchmarking set for docking at http://blaster.docking.org/dud/.

Computational Drug Discovery MethodsClick Chemistry and ApplicationsSynthesis and biological activityDocking (animal)ChemistryBenchmarkingDecoyComputational biologyStereochemistryReceptorBiochemistryBiology

MeSH terms

Adenosine DeaminaseAldehyde ReductaseBinding SitesPharmaceutical PreparationsInhibinsLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsReceptors, EstrogenThymidine KinaseDrug DesignDatabases, FactualQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

Funding

  • Inha University
  • National Institutes of Health
Citations
1,311
FWCI
36.90
field-weighted impact
References
84
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.