review Open AccessTop 1% cited
A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health
BMC Public Health · 2014 · Vol. 14(1) · pp. 1144–1144
Willem G. van Panhuis✉(University of Pittsburgh)Proma Paul(University of Pittsburgh)Claudia Emerson(University of Toronto)John J. Grefenstette(University of Pittsburgh)Richard Wilder(Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation)Abraham J Herbst(Indepth Network)Dominique Heymann(Chatham House)Donald S. Burke(University of Pittsburgh)
Abstract
The simultaneous effect of multiple interacting barriers ranging from technical to intangible issues has greatly complicated advances in public health data sharing. A systematic framework of barriers to data sharing in public health will be essential to accelerate the use of valuable information for the global good.
Ethics in Clinical ResearchData-Driven Disease SurveillanceMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsData sharingPublic healthSystematic reviewMedicineGrey literatureContext (archaeology)Global healthBiostatisticsPublic relationsHealth policy
MeSH terms
Communication BarriersHumansPublic HealthGlobal HealthInformation Dissemination
Funding
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Citations
587
FWCI
19.92
field-weighted impact
References
73
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ · 2009 · 82,871 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · 19,782 citations
Morbidity and mortality weekly report
The American Journal of Medicine · 1997 · 4,719 citations
Related articles
What do medical students think about bio statistics education?
International Journal of Advanced Community Medicine · 2019 · 0 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.