Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations

Molecular Ecology · 2003 · Vol. 12(10) · pp. 2511–2523
Adam G. JonesWilliam R. Ardren

Abstract

The recent proliferation of hypervariable molecular markers has ushered in a surge of techniques for the analysis of parentage in natural and experimental populations. Consequently, the potential for meaningful studies of paternity and maternity is at an all-time high. However, the details and implementation of the multifarious techniques often differ in subtle ways that can influence the results of parentage analyses. Now is a good time to reflect on the available techniques and to consider their strengths and weaknesses. Here, we review the leading techniques in parentage analysis, with a particular emphasis on those that have been implemented in readily useable software packages. Our survey leads to some important insights with respect to the utility of the different approaches. This review should serve as a useful guide to anyone who wishes to embark on the study of parentage.

Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsBiologyStrengths and weaknessesNatural (archaeology)Evolutionary biologyData scienceHypervariable regionGenealogyGeneticsComputer scienceEpistemology

MeSH terms

AllelesGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationPedigreeLinkage DisequilibriumLikelihood FunctionsMicrosatellite Repeats
Citations
668
FWCI
19.20
field-weighted impact
References
58
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Microsatellite mutations in the germline:
Trends in Genetics · 2000 · 677 citations
ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS
Evolution · 1989 · 2,858 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.