Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2014 · Vol. 281(1780) · pp. 20133330–20133330
Myla F. J. AronsonFrank A. La SorteCharles H. NilonMadhusudan KattiMark A. GoddardChristopher A. LepczykPaige S. WarrenNicholas S. G. WilliamsSarel S. CilliersBruce D. ClarksonCynnamon DobbsRebecca W. DolanMarcus HedblomStefan KlotzJip Louwe KooijmansIngolf KühnIan MacGregor‐ForsMark J. McDonnellUlla MörtbergPetr PyšekStefan J. SiebertJessica R. SushinskyP. WernerMarten Winter

Abstract

Urbanization contributes to the loss of the world's biodiversity and the homogenization of its biota. However, comparative studies of urban biodiversity leading to robust generalities of the status and drivers of biodiversity in cities at the global scale are lacking. Here, we compiled the largest global dataset to date of two diverse taxa in cities: birds (54 cities) and plants (110 cities). We found that the majority of urban bird and plant species are native in the world's cities. Few plants and birds are cosmopolitan, the most common being Columba livia and Poa annua. The density of bird and plant species (the number of species per km(2)) has declined substantially: only 8% of native bird and 25% of native plant species are currently present compared with estimates of non-urban density of species. The current density of species in cities and the loss in density of species was best explained by anthropogenic features (landcover, city age) rather than by non-anthropogenic factors (geography, climate, topography). As urbanization continues to expand, efforts directed towards the conservation of intact vegetation within urban landscapes could support higher concentrations of both bird and plant species. Despite declines in the density of species, cities still retain endemic native species, thus providing opportunities for regional and global biodiversity conservation, restoration and education.

Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Green Space and HealthEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesUrbanizationBiodiversityGeographyUrban ecologyEcologyBiotaBiodiversity hotspotSpecies richnessIntroduced speciesGlobal biodiversity

MeSH terms

AnimalsBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansHuman ActivitiesPlantsPopulation DynamicsUrbanizationBiodiversity
Citations
1,689
FWCI
63.41
field-weighted impact
References
51
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Journal of Wildlife Management · 2003 · 42,134 citations
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2012 · 4,576 citations
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Nature · 2000 · 30,790 citations
Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress
Journal of Environmental Management · 2010 · 1,104 citations
Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data
Journal of Animal Ecology · 2003 · 1,734 citations
Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation
BioScience · 2002 · 3,568 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers · Scinovex