Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Levodopa‐induced dyskinesias

Movement Disorders · 2007 · Vol. 22(10) · pp. 1379–1389
Giovanni FabbriniJonathan M. BrotchieFrancisco GrandasMasahiro NomotoChristopher G. Goetz

Abstract

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) are common and difficult to treat. This review focuses on three issues related to LID: clinical features, classification and rating, pathophysiology and pathogenesis, and management. The three primary clinical syndromes are OFF-period dystonia, peak-dose dyskinesia, and diphasic dyskinesia. Several other forms also occur, making the evaluation and choice of treatment complicated. A core component of the pathophysiology of LID is overactivity of the direct striatal output pathway. This pathway provides a direct GABAergic connection by which the striatum inhibits the output regions of the basal ganglia, i.e., the internal globus pallidus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata. Altering dopaminergic dosing and timing can abate dyskinesias, but usually impact the control of parkinsonism. Putative therapies to reduce the problem of dyskinesias could focus on the glutamatergic, GABAergic, alpha2 adrenergic, serotonergic (5HT1A, 5HT2A), opioid, histamine H3, adenosine A2A receptors, the monoamine transport or cannabinoid CB1 receptors systems. The only currently available drug with an evidence-based recommendation on efficacy for dyskinesia is amantadine. Therapy goals include the prevention of dyskinesia and treatment of dyskinesias that are troublesome clinically. New rating measures to assess severity and disability related to dyskinesia are in the process of development and clinimetric testing.

Neurological disorders and treatmentsGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsLevodopaDyskinesiaMedicineParkinson's diseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineDisease

MeSH terms

Antiparkinson AgentsDyskinesia, Drug-InducedHumansLevodopaParkinson DiseaseQuality of LifeReview Literature as TopicPubMed
Citations
461
FWCI
18.15
field-weighted impact
References
85
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.