Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Technologies for nanofluidic systems: top-down vs. bottom-up—a review

Lab on a Chip · 2005 · Vol. 5(5) · pp. 492–492
D. MijatovicJan C. T. EijkelAlbert van den Berg

Abstract

This paper gives an overview of the most commonly used techniques for nanostructuring and nanochannel fabrication employed in nanofluidics. They are divided into two large categories: top-down and bottom-up methods. Top-down methods are based on patterning on large scale while reducing the lateral dimensions to the nanoscale. Bottom-up methods arrange atoms and molecules in nanostructures. Here, we review the advantages and disadvantages of those methods and give some future perspectives. It is concluded that technology in the region of 1-10 nm is lacking and potentially can be covered by using the pulsed-laser deposition method as a controlled way for thin film deposition (thickness of a few nanometers) and further structuring by the top-down method.

Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesNanofluidicsNanotechnologyNanometreFabricationNanoscopic scaleMaterials scienceStructuringDeposition (geology)NanostructureLaser ablation

MeSH terms

Equipment DesignSurface PropertiesNanotechnologyMicrofluidicsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNanostructures
Citations
504
FWCI
22.11
field-weighted impact
References
81
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Nature · 2006 · 9,283 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Technologies for nanofluidic systems: top-down vs. bottom-up—a review · Scinovex