Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Image Deblurring and Super-Resolution by Adaptive Sparse Domain Selection and Adaptive Regularization

IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2011 · Vol. 20(7) · pp. 1838–1857
Weisheng DongLei ZhangGuangming ShiXiaolin Wu

Abstract

As a powerful statistical image modeling technique, sparse representation has been successfully used in various image restoration applications. The success of sparse representation owes to the development of the l(1)-norm optimization techniques and the fact that natural images are intrinsically sparse in some domains. The image restoration quality largely depends on whether the employed sparse domain can represent well the underlying image. Considering that the contents can vary significantly across different images or different patches in a single image, we propose to learn various sets of bases from a precollected dataset of example image patches, and then, for a given patch to be processed, one set of bases are adaptively selected to characterize the local sparse domain. We further introduce two adaptive regularization terms into the sparse representation framework. First, a set of autoregressive (AR) models are learned from the dataset of example image patches. The best fitted AR models to a given patch are adaptively selected to regularize the image local structures. Second, the image nonlocal self-similarity is introduced as another regularization term. In addition, the sparsity regularization parameter is adaptively estimated for better image restoration performance. Extensive experiments on image deblurring and super-resolution validate that by using adaptive sparse domain selection and adaptive regularization, the proposed method achieves much better results than many state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of both PSNR and visual perception.

Advanced Image Processing TechniquesSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesImage and Signal Denoising MethodsDeblurringSparse approximationRegularization (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image restorationImage (mathematics)Image processingRepresentation (politics)Iterative reconstruction

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlantsRegression AnalysisDatabases, Factual
Citations
1,106
FWCI
42.94
field-weighted impact
References
58
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Nonlocally Centralized Sparse Representation for Image Restoration
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2012 · 1,530 citations
References
A New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2007 · 2,036 citations
What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding?
Neural Computation · 1994 · 1,219 citations
Image restoration by sparse 3D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2008 · 461 citations
Sparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2007 · 1,725 citations
Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies?
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2006 · 6,865 citations
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2004 · 54,590 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.