Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Abstract

Immediate effects of verb-specific syntactic (subcategorization) information were found in a cross-modal naming experiment, a self-paced reading experiment, and an experiment in which eye movements were monitored. In the reading studies, syntactic misanalysis effects in sentence complements (e.g., "The student forgot the solution was...") occurred at the verb in the complement (e.g., was) for matrix verbs typically used with noun phrase complements but not for verbs typically used with sentence complements. In addition, a complementizer effect for sentence-complement-biased verbs was not due to syntactic misanalysis but was correlated with how strongly a particular verb prefers to be followed by the complementizer that. The results support models that make immediate use of lexically specific constraints, especially constraint-based models, but are problematic for lexical filtering models.

Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningComplementizerVerbSentence processingSentenceSubcategorizationLinguisticsComplement (music)Modal verbPsychologyNoun
Citations
676
FWCI
7.03
field-weighted impact
References
66
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · 1994 · 648 citations
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
Trends in Cognitive Sciences · 2002 · 2,235 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.