Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Input feature selection for classification problems

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2002 · Vol. 13(1) · pp. 143–159
Nojun KwakChong-Ho Choi

Abstract

Feature selection plays an important role in classifying systems such as neural networks (NNs). We use a set of attributes which are relevant, irrelevant or redundant and from the viewpoint of managing a dataset which can be huge, reducing the number of attributes by selecting only the relevant ones is desirable. In doing so, higher performances with lower computational effort is expected. In this paper, we propose two feature selection algorithms. The limitation of mutual information feature selector (MIFS) is analyzed and a method to overcome this limitation is studied. One of the proposed algorithms makes more considered use of mutual information between input attributes and output classes than the MIFS. What is demonstrated is that the proposed method can provide the performance of the ideal greedy selection algorithm when information is distributed uniformly. The computational load for this algorithm is nearly the same as that of MIFS. In addition, another feature selection algorithm using the Taguchi method is proposed. This is advanced as a solution to the question as to how to identify good features with as few experiments as possible. The proposed algorithms are applied to several classification problems and compared with MIFS. These two algorithms can be combined to complement each other's limitations. The combined algorithm performed well in several experiments and should prove to be a useful method in selecting features for classification problems.

Neural Networks and ApplicationsFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFace and Expression RecognitionComputer scienceFeature selectionMutual informationGreedy algorithmFeature (linguistics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Complement (music)Artificial intelligenceData miningSet (abstract data type)
Citations
934
FWCI
24.94
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Normalized Mutual Information Feature Selection
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2009 · 1,271 citations
Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation
Expert Systems with Applications · 2015 · 654 citations
References
Design of Experiments
BMJ · 1936 · 4,217 citations
Classification and Regression Trees.
Biometrics · 1984 · 23,850 citations
Applied Regression Analysis
Technometrics · 2005 · 18,043 citations
Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information
Physical review. A, General physics · 1986 · 4,519 citations
Principal Component Analysis
Technometrics · 1988 · 8,686 citations
Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 1994 · 2,571 citations
Classification and regression trees
European Journal of Operational Research · 1985 · 10,158 citations
Classification and Regression Trees.
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1986 · 21,013 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.