Scinovex
editorial Open AccessTop 1% cited

Editorial: Assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2010 · Vol. 65(4) · pp. 601–604
Štefan SchwarzP. SilleyShabbir SimjeeNeil WoodfordEngeline van DuijkerenAlan P. JohnsonWim Gaastra

Abstract

The accurate performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animal sources and the correct presentation of the results is a complex matter. A review of the published literature revealed a number of recurring errors with regard to methodology, quality control, appropriate interpretive criteria, and calculation of MIC(50) and MIC(90) values. Although more subjective, there is also no consensus regarding the definition of multiresistance. This Editorial is intended to provide guidance to authors on how to avoid these frequently detected shortcomings.

MeSH terms

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDiagnostic ErrorsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsQuality ControlDrug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Citations
441
FWCI
12.18
field-weighted impact
References
8
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2005 · 1,049 citations
BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 7)
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2008 · 738 citations
Nomenclature for Macrolide and Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B Resistance Determinants
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 1999 · 871 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.