Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Best Practices for Justifying Fossil Calibrations

Systematic Biology · 2011 · Vol. 61(2) · pp. 346–359
James F. ParhamPhilip C. J. DonoghueChristopher J. BellTyler CalwayJason J. HeadPatricia A. HolroydJun InoueRandall B. IrmisWalter G. JoyceDaniel T. KsepkaJosé Salvatore Leister PatanéNathan D. SmithJames E. TarverMarcel van TuinenZiheng YangKenneth D. AngielczykJenny M. GreenwoodChristy A. HipsleyLouis L. JacobsPeter J. MakovickyJohannes MüllerKrister T. SmithJessica M. TheodorRachel C. M. WarnockMichael J. Benton

Abstract

Our ability to correlate biological evolution with climate change, geological evolution, and other historical patterns is essential to understanding the processes that shape biodiversity. Combining data from the fossil record with molecular phylogenetics represents an exciting synthetic approach to this challenge. The first molecular divergence dating analysis (Zuckerkandl and Pauling 1962) was based on a measure of the amino acid differences in the hemoglobin molecule, with replacement rates established (calibrated) using paleontological age estimates from textbooks (e.g., Dodson 1960). Since that time, the amount of molecular sequence data has increased dramatically, affording ever-greater opportunities to apply molecular divergence approaches to fundamental problems in evolutionary biology.

Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyScopusBiologyProcess (computing)Computer scienceMEDLINEProgramming language

MeSH terms

AnimalsCalibrationClassificationFossilsPhylogeny

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
  • University of Utah
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Sight Research UK
  • University of Bristol
  • California State University, East Bay
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Citations
773
FWCI
58.24
field-weighted impact
References
162
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.