Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study

Journal of Applied Ecology · 2007 · Vol. 45(1) · pp. 141–150
Regula BilleterJaan LiiraDebra BaileyR.J.F. BugterPaul ArensIsabel AugensteinS. AvironJacques BaudryRoman BukáčekFrançoise BurelM. CernyGeert De BlustRaphaël De CockTim DiekötterHansjörg DietzJ. DirksenCarsten F. DormannWalter DurkaMark FrenzelR. HamerskyF. HendrickxFélix HerzogStefan KlotzB.J.H. KoolstraAngela LauschD. Le CoeurJ. P. MaelfaitP.F.M. OpdamMartina RoubalovaAgnes SchermannNicolas SchermannTorsten C. SchmidtOliver SchweigerM.J.M. SmuldersMarjan SpeelmansP. SimovaJ. VerboomW.K.R.E. van WingerdenMartin ZobelPeter J. Edwards

Abstract

Summary In many European agricultural landscapes, species richness is declining considerably. Studies performed at a very large spatial scale are helpful in understanding the reasons for this decline and as a basis for guiding policy. In a unique, large‐scale study of 25 agricultural landscapes in seven European countries, we investigated relationships between species richness in several taxa, and the links between biodiversity and landscape structure and management. We estimated the total species richness of vascular plants, birds and five arthropod groups in each 16‐km 2 landscape, and recorded various measures of both landscape structure and intensity of agricultural land use. We studied correlations between taxonomic groups and the effects of landscape and land‐use parameters on the number of species in different taxonomic groups. Our statistical approach also accounted for regional variation in species richness unrelated to landscape or land‐use factors. The results reveal strong geographical trends in species richness in all taxonomic groups. No single species group emerged as a good predictor of all other species groups. Species richness of all groups increased with the area of semi‐natural habitats in the landscape. Species richness of birds and vascular plants was negatively associated with fertilizer use. Synthesis and applications. We conclude that indicator taxa are unlikely to provide an effective means of predicting biodiversity at a large spatial scale, especially where there is large biogeographical variation in species richness. However, a small list of landscape and land‐use parameters can be used in agricultural landscapes to infer large‐scale patterns of species richness. Our results suggest that to halt the loss of biodiversity in these landscapes, it is important to preserve and, if possible, increase the area of semi‐natural habitat.

Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant and animal studiesLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSpecies richnessBiodiversityEcologyGeographyHabitatVascular plantTaxonAgricultureSpatial ecologyAgricultural land

Funding

  • Stichting Nederlands Oogheelkundig Onderzoek
Citations
714
FWCI
29.32
field-weighted impact
References
63
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
SAS System for Mixed Models
Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1996 · 10,441 citations
Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2002 · 839 citations
Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Science · 2000 · 9,125 citations
Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
Journal of Applied Ecology · 2002 · 1,523 citations
Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
Trends in Ecology & Evolution · 2003 · 3,103 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.