article Open AccessTop 1% cited
When to use agreement versus reliability measures
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2006 · Vol. 59(10) · pp. 1033–1039
Henrica C. W. de Vet✉(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)Caroline B. Terwee(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)Dirk L. Knol(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)L.M. Bouter(Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc)
Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyInter-rater reliabilityReliability (semiconductor)StatisticsObservational errorLimits of agreementReproducibilityRepeated measures designRange (aeronautics)Measure (data warehouse)Psychology
MeSH terms
HumansTerminology as TopicResearch DesignReproducibility of ResultsObserver VariationRange of Motion, ArticularOutcome Assessment, Health CareShoulder PainPhysical Therapy Modalities
Citations
1,761
FWCI
31.50
field-weighted impact
References
17
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2010 · 2,041 citations
References
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
The Lancet · 1986 · 47,160 citations
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2003 · 1,327 citations
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · 1997 · 1,536 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
