Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Investigation of the random forest framework for classification of hyperspectral data

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2005 · Vol. 43(3) · pp. 492–501
Jeroen van der HamYangchi ChenMelba M. CrawfordJoydeep Ghosh

Abstract

Statistical classification of byperspectral data is challenging because the inputs are high in dimension and represent multiple classes that are sometimes quite mixed, while the amount and quality of ground truth in the form of labeled data is typically limited. The resulting classifiers are often unstable and have poor generalization. This work investigates two approaches based on the concept of random forests of classifiers implemented within a binary hierarchical multiclassifier system, with the goal of achieving improved generalization of the classifier in analysis of hyperspectral data, particularly when the quantity of training data is limited. A new classifier is proposed that incorporates bagging of training samples and adaptive random subspace feature selection within a binary hierarchical classifier (BHC), such that the number of features that is selected at each node of the tree is dependent on the quantity of associated training data. Results are compared to a random forest implementation based on the framework of classification and regression trees. For both methods, classification results obtained from experiments on data acquired by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer instrument over the Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and by Hyperion on the NASA Earth Observing 1 satellite over the Okavango Delta of Botswana are superior to those from the original best basis BHC algorithm and a random subspace extension of the BHC.

Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationGeochemistry and Geologic MappingSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesRandom forestHyperspectral imagingComputer scienceSubspace topologyRandom subspace methodArtificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)Pattern recognition (psychology)Binary classificationRemote sensing

Funding

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Citations
1,219
FWCI
24.59
field-weighted impact
References
32
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Classification and Regression Trees.
Biometrics · 1984 · 23,850 citations
The random subspace method for constructing decision forests
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 1998 · 6,773 citations
Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms
Technometrics · 2005 · 3,234 citations
Random Forests
Machine Learning · 2001 · 121,242 citations
Bagging Predictors
Machine Learning · 1996 · 16,689 citations
Classification and Regression Trees.
Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1986 · 21,013 citations
Bagging predictors
Machine Learning · 1996 · 16,271 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.