Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

A general mass‐conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation

Water Resources Research · 1990 · Vol. 26(7) · pp. 1483–1496

Abstract

Numerical approximations based on different forms of the governing partial differential equation can lead to significantly different results for unsaturated flow problems. Numerical solution based on the standard h ‐based form of Richards equation generally yields poor results, characterized by large mass balance errors and erroneous estimates of infiltration depth. Conversely, numerical solutions based on the mixed form of Richards equation can be shown to possess the conservative property, so that mass is perfectly conserved. This leads to significant improvement in numerical solution performance, while requiring no additional computational effort. However, use of the mass‐conservative method does not guarantee good solutions. Accurate solution of the unsaturated flow equation also requires use of a diagonal time (or mass) matrix. Only when diagonal time matrices are used can the solution be shown to obey a maximum principle, which guarantees smooth, nonoscillatory infiltration profiles. This highlights the fact that proper treatment of the time derivative is critical in the numerical solution of unsaturated flow.

Computational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsSoil and Unsaturated FlowGroundwater flow and contamination studiesRichards equationMathematicsConservation of massNumerical analysisDiagonalPartial differential equationApplied mathematicsFlow (mathematics)Infiltration (HVAC)Order of accuracy
Citations
1,743
FWCI
18.03
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
A Comparison of Numerical Simulation Models For One‐Dimensional Infiltration
Soil Science Society of America Journal · 1977 · 647 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.