Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

BRIEF COMMUNICATION.

Psychological Medicine · 1997 · Vol. 27(1) · pp. 231–235
Aartjan T.F. BeekmanDorly J. H. DeegJacques van LimbeekArjan W. BraamM. Z. DE VRIESW. van Tilburg

Abstract

The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) has been widely used in studies of late-life depression. Psychometric properties are generally favourable, but data on the criterion validity of the CES-D in elderly community-based samples are lacking. In a sample of older (55-85 years) inhabitants of the Netherlands, 487 subjects were selected to study criterion validity of the CES-D. Using the 1-month prevalence of major depression derived from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) as criterion, the weighted sensitivity of the CES-D was 100%; specificity 88%; and positive predictive value 13.2%. False positives were not more likely among elderly with physical illness, cognitive decline or anxiety. We conclude that the criterion validity of the CES-D for major depression was very satisfactory in this sample of older adults.

Health disparities and outcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchDepression (economics)PsychologyCriterion validityAnxietyClinical psychologyCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScalePsychiatryConstruct validityPsychometricsGerontology

MeSH terms

AgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyChronic DiseaseDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReference ValuesSampling StudiesSensitivity and Specificity
Citations
1,121
FWCI
10.19
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Major and minor depression in later life: a study of prevalence and risk factors
Journal of Affective Disorders · 1995 · 570 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

BRIEF COMMUNICATION. · Scinovex