Scinovex
article Open Access

Multiclass Brain–Computer Interface Classification by Riemannian Geometry

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2011 · Vol. 59(4) · pp. 920–928
Alexandre BarachantStéphane BonnetMarco CongedoChristian Jutten

Abstract

This paper presents a new classification framework for brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor imagery. This framework involves the concept of Riemannian geometry in the manifold of covariance matrices. The main idea is to use spatial covariance matrices as EEG signal descriptors and to rely on Riemannian geometry to directly classify these matrices using the topology of the manifold of symmetric and positive definite (SPD) matrices. This framework allows to extract the spatial information contained in EEG signals without using spatial filtering. Two methods are proposed and compared with a reference method [multiclass Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)] on the multiclass dataset IIa from the BCI Competition IV. The first method, named minimum distance to Riemannian mean (MDRM), is an implementation of the minimum distance to mean (MDM) classification algorithm using Riemannian distance and Riemannian mean. This simple method shows comparable results with the reference method. The second method, named tangent space LDA (TSLDA), maps the covariance matrices onto the Riemannian tangent space where matrices can be vectorized and treated as Euclidean objects. Then, a variable selection procedure is applied in order to decrease dimensionality and a classification by LDA is performed. This latter method outperforms the reference method increasing the mean classification accuracy from 65.1% to 70.2%.

EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeural dynamics and brain functionRiemannian geometryCovarianceMathematicsTangent spaceLinear discriminant analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Riemannian manifoldArtificial intelligenceEuclidean spaceCurse of dimensionality

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsElectroencephalographyHumansImaginationMotor CortexMovementPattern Recognition, AutomatedSensitivity and SpecificityUser-Computer InterfaceReproducibility of ResultsEvoked Potentials, Motor
Citations
786
FWCI
2.53
field-weighted impact
References
23
Percentile
89%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.