Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Final Results from the<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant

The Astrophysical Journal · 2001 · Vol. 553(1) · pp. 47–72
Wendy L. FreedmanBarry F. MadoreBrad K. GibsonLaura FerrareseDaniel D. KelsonShoko SakaiJeremy R. MouldRobert C. Kennicutt, Jr.Holland C. FordJohn A. GrahamJohn P. HuchraShaun M. G. HughesGarth D. IllingworthLucas M. MacriPeter B. Stetson

Abstract

We present here the final results of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Key Project to measure the Hubble constant. We summarize our method, the results, and the uncertainties, tabulate our revised distances, and give the implications of these results for cosmology. Our results are based on a Cepheid calibration of several secondary distance methods applied over the range of about 60–400 Mpc. The analysis presented here benefits from a number of recent improvements and refinements, including (1) a larger LMC Cepheid sample to define the fiducial period-luminosity (PL) relations, (2) a more recent HST Wide Field and Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) photometric calibration, (3) a correction for Cepheid metallicity, and (4) a correction for incompleteness bias in the observed Cepheid PL samples. We adopt a distance modulus to the LMC (relative to which the more distant galaxies are measured) of μ0 = 18.50 ± 0.10 mag, or 50 kpc. New, revised distances are given for the 18 spiral galaxies for which Cepheids have been discovered as part of the Key Project, as well as for 13 additional galaxies with published Cepheid data. The new calibration results in a Cepheid distance to NGC 4258 in better agreement with the maser distance to this galaxy. Based on these revised Cepheid distances, we find values (in km s-1 Mpc-1) of H0 = 71 ± 2 ± 6 (systematic) (Type Ia supernovae), H0 = 71 ± 3 ± 7 (Tully-Fisher relation), H0 = 70 ± 5 ± 6 (surface brightness fluctuations), H0 = 72 ± 9 ± 7 (Type II supernovae), and H0 = 82 ± 6 ± 9 (fundamental plane). We combine these results for the different methods with three different weighting schemes, and find good agreement and consistency with H0 = 72 ± 8 km s-1 Mpc-1. Finally, we compare these results with other, global methods for measuring H0.

Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchCepheid variableHubble's lawDistance modulusGalaxySpiral galaxyHubble space telescopeCosmic distance ladderAdvanced Camera for SurveysHubble Ultra-Deep Field
Citations
3,058
FWCI
143.37
field-weighted impact
References
143
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2006 · 1,345 citations
The<i>IRAS</i>Revised Bright Galaxy Sample
The Astronomical Journal · 2003 · 1,051 citations
The effective field theory of dark energy
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2013 · 458 citations
Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP
Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2004 · 3,764 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Final Results from the<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant · Scinovex