Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide

Conservation Biology · 2003 · Vol. 17(6) · pp. 1491–1499
Adrian TrevesK. Ullas Karanth

Abstract

Abstract: Carnivore conservation depends on the sociopolitical landscape as much as the biological landscape. Changing political attitudes and views of nature have shifted the goals of carnivore management from those based on fear and narrow economic interests to those based on a better understanding of ecosystem function and adaptive management. In parallel, aesthetic and scientific arguments against lethal control techniques are encouraging the development of nonlethal approaches to carnivore management. We anticipate greater success in modifying the manner and frequency with which the activities of humans and domestic animals intersect with those of carnivores. Success should permit carnivore populations to persist for decades despite human population growth and modification of habitat.

Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and biodiversity studiesGeographies of human-animal interactionsCarnivoreGeographyPopulationEcologyEnvironmental resource managementBiologySociologyPredationEconomics
Citations
1,583
FWCI
23.25
field-weighted impact
References
76
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Wildlife conservation conflicts in Europe
International journal of applied research · 2017 · 0 citations
References
The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species
Journal of Wildlife Management · 1971 · 1,162 citations
Prey Selection by Tiger, Leopard and Dhole in Tropical Forests
Journal of Animal Ecology · 1995 · 654 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Human‐Carnivore Conflict and Perspectives on Carnivore Management Worldwide · Scinovex