Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 2003 · Vol. 29(5) · pp. 665–675
Matthew L. NewmanJames W. PennebakerDiane S. BerryJane M. Richards

Abstract

Telling lies often requires creating a story about an experience or attitude that does not exist. As a result, false stories may be qualitatively different from true stories. The current project investigated the features of linguistic style that distinguish between true and false stories. In an analysis of five independent samples, a computer-based text analysis program correctly classified liars and truth-tellers at a rate of 67% when the topic was constant and a rate of 61% overall. Compared to truth-tellers, liars showed lower cognitive complexity, used fewer self-references and other-references, and used more negative emotion words.

Deception detection and forensic psychologyAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingMisinformation and Its ImpactsDeceptionLyingPsychologyStyle (visual arts)Lie detectionSocial psychologyLinguisticsCognitive psychologyPhilosophyLiterature

MeSH terms

AdultFemaleHumansLinguisticsDeceptionMaleSemanticsVerbal BehaviorVideotape RecordingVocabulary
Citations
1,449
FWCI
18.76
field-weighted impact
References
65
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
Annual Review of Psychology · 2002 · 2,541 citations
References
Word Use in the Poetry of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Poets
Psychosomatic Medicine · 2001 · 558 citations
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
Annual Review of Psychology · 2002 · 2,541 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles · Scinovex