review Open AccessTop 10% cited
The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis.
American Journal of Public Health · 1994 · Vol. 84(7) · pp. 1086–1093
Donald L. Patrick✉Allen Cheadle(University of Washington)D. C. Thompson(University of Washington)Paula Diehr(University of Washington)Thomas D. Koepsell(University of Washington)Susan Kinne(University of Washington)
Abstract
Self-reports of smoking are accurate in most studies. To improve accuracy, biochemical assessment, preferably with cotinine plasma, should be considered in intervention studies and student populations.
Smoking Behavior and CessationObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing EducationCotinineMedicineObservational studyMeta-analysisClinical psychologyEnvironmental healthPsychologyNicotineDemographyInternal medicine
MeSH terms
HumansSelf DisclosureSensitivity and SpecificitySmokingReproducibility of Results
Funding
- National Cancer Institute
Citations
1,747
FWCI
11.56
field-weighted impact
References
40
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2002 · 521 citations
Smoking and female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Human Reproduction · 1998 · 507 citations
Sensitive questions in surveys.
Psychological Bulletin · 2007 · 2,905 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.