Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Making optimal use of empirical energy functions: Force‐field parameterization in crystal space

Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2004 · Vol. 57(4) · pp. 678–683
Elmar KriegerTom DardenSander B. NabuursAlexei V. FinkelsteinGert Vriend

Abstract

Today's energy functions are not able yet to distinguish reliably between correct and almost correct protein models. Improving these near-native models is currently a major bottle-neck in homology modeling or experimental structure determination at low resolution. Increasingly accurate energy functions are required to complete the "last mile of the protein folding problem," for example during a molecular dynamics simulation. We present a new approach to reach this goal. For 50 high resolution X-ray structures, the complete unit cell was reconstructed, including disordered water molecules, counter ions, and hydrogen atoms. Simulations were then run at the pH at which the crystal was solved, while force-field parameters were iteratively adjusted so that the damage done to the structures was minimal. Starting with initial parameters from the AMBER force field, the optimization procedure converged at a new force field called YAMBER (Yet Another Model Building and Energy Refinement force field), which is shown to do significantly less damage to X-ray structures, often move homology models in the right direction, and occasionally make them look like experimental structures. Application of YAMBER during the CASP5 structure prediction experiment yielded a model for target 176 that was ranked first among 150 submissions. Due to its compatibility with the well-established AMBER format, YAMBER can be used by almost any molecular dynamics program. The parameters are freely available from www.yasara.org/yamber.

Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsForce field (fiction)Molecular dynamicsComputer scienceStatistical physicsAlgorithmEnergy minimizationPhysicsChemistryComputational chemistryArtificial intelligence

MeSH terms

Computer SimulationRibonuclease T1Models, MolecularProteinsThermodynamicsProtein Structure, TertiaryCrystallography, X-RayStructural Homology, Protein
Citations
857
FWCI
6.96
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
New ways to boost molecular dynamics simulations
Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2015 · 1,034 citations
References
All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 1998 · 14,418 citations
Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath
The Journal of Chemical Physics · 1984 · 30,535 citations
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
The Journal of Chemical Physics · 1995 · 22,460 citations
Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA—a self‐parameterizing force field
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2002 · 1,516 citations
A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules
Journal of the American Chemical Society · 1995 · 13,076 citations
The Protein Data Bank
Nucleic Acids Research · 2000 · 39,191 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.