Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients

Critical Care Medicine · 1999 · Vol. 27(7) · pp. 1325–1329
Richard R. RikerJean T. PicardGilles L. Fraser

Abstract

SAS is both reliable (high interrater agreement) and valid (high correlation with the Harris and Ramsay scales) in assessing agitation and sedation in adult ICU patients. SAS provides additional information by stratifying agitation into three categories (compared with one for the Ramsay scale) without sacrificing validity or reliability.

Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsSedationInter-rater reliabilityMedicineIntensive care unitIntensive careConstruct validityCritically illPsychometricsAnesthesiaRating scale

MeSH terms

AdultAgedFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsIntubationMaleMiddle AgedNursing AssessmentProspective StudiesPsychometricsPsychomotor AgitationReproducibility of ResultsObserver Variation
Citations
960
FWCI
12.81
field-weighted impact
References
20
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients · Scinovex