article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist
PLoS Medicine · 2014 · Vol. 11(10) · pp. e1001744–e1001744
Karel G. M. Moons✉(University Medical Center Utrecht)Joris A. H. de Groot(University Medical Center Utrecht)Walter Bouwmeester(University Medical Center Utrecht)Yvonne Vergouwe(University Medical Center Utrecht)Susan Mallett(University of Oxford)Douglas G. Altman(University of Oxford)Johannes B. Reitsma(University Medical Center Utrecht)Gary S. Collins(University of Oxford)
Abstract
Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsReliability and Agreement in MeasurementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChecklistCritical appraisalData extractionSystematic reviewMEDLINEMedicineData scienceComputer sciencePsychologyAlternative medicine
MeSH terms
Decision Support TechniquesHumansModels, Theoretical
Funding
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Citations
1,871
FWCI
36.87
field-weighted impact
References
158
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 5,044 citations
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
British journal of surgery · 2015 · 827 citations
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2019 · 1,841 citations
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
BMJ · 2015 · 3,824 citations
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement
British Journal of Cancer · 2015 · 3,343 citations
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2015 · 2,750 citations
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
BMJ · 2020 · 3,177 citations
PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2018 · 2,341 citations
References
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables
BMJ · 2006 · 2,482 citations
Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 1995 · 2,095 citations
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 10,387 citations
Methodologic Standards for the Development of Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine
Annals of Emergency Medicine · 1999 · 577 citations
REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)
British Journal of Cancer · 2005 · 1,372 citations
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
BMJ · 2010 · 8,953 citations
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 1996 · 8,674 citations
The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · 1992 · 1,067 citations
Related articles
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.