Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

A Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction

Journal of Marriage and the Family · 1988 · Vol. 50(1) · pp. 93–93
Susan S. Hendrick

Abstract

The variety of interpersonal relationships contemporary society necessitates the development of brief, reliable measures of satisfaction that are applicable to many types of close relationships. This article describes the development of such a measure. In Study I, the 7-item Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS) was administered to 125 subjects who reported themselves to be in love. Analyses revealed a unifactorial scale structure, substantial factor loadings, and moderate intercorrelations among the items. The scale correlated significantly with measures of love, sexual attitudes, self-disclosure, commitment, and investment a relationship. In Study II, the scale was administered to 57 couples ongoing relationships. Analyses supported a single factor, alpha reliability of .86, and correlations with relevant relationship measures. The scale correlated .80 with a longer criterion measure, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976), and both scales were effective (with a subsample) discriminating couples who stayed together from couples who broke up. The RAS is a brief, psychometrically sound, generic measure of relationship satisfaction.

Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsPsychologyScale (ratio)Interpersonal relationshipInterpersonal communicationSocial psychologyReliability (semiconductor)Measure (data warehouse)Test validityPsychometricsDevelopmental psychology
Citations
2,203
FWCI
8.15
field-weighted impact
References
9
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Costs and Rewards of Children: The Effects of Becoming a Parent on Adults' Lives
Journal of Marriage and the Family · 2003 · 657 citations
The Measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 2000 · 1,044 citations
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.