Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods

Expert Systems with Applications · 2010 · Vol. 37(12) · pp. 7745–7754
Chia‐Chi Sun
Multi-Criteria Decision MakingEvaluation and Optimization ModelsEvaluation Methods in Various FieldsTOPSISVaguenessComputer scienceIdeal solutionFuzzy logicAnalytic hierarchy processMultiple-criteria decision analysisFuzzy numberArtificial intelligenceData mining
Citations
790
FWCI
30.80
field-weighted impact
References
58
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements
Expert Systems with Applications · 2020 · 961 citations
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
Expert Systems with Applications · 2012 · 2,397 citations
A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2016 · 1,557 citations
References
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1981 · 8,269 citations
Fuzzy hierarchical analysis
Fuzzy Sets and Systems · 1985 · 3,209 citations
Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method
Expert Systems with Applications · 2006 · 1,184 citations
Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS
European Journal of Operational Research · 2003 · 4,666 citations
A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management
International Journal of Production Economics · 2005 · 1,609 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.