Scinovex
reviewTop 10% cited

A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Michael TombuPierre Jolicœur

Abstract

The authors present the central capacity sharing (CCS) model and derive equations describing its behaviors to explain results from dual-task situations. The predictions of the CCS model are contrasted with those of the central bottleneck model. The CCS model predicts all of the hallmark effects of the psychological refractory period (PRP) pardigm: -1 slope of the PRP effect at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), underadditivity of precentral Task 2 manipulations, additivity of central or postcentral Task 2 manipulations with SOA, and carry forward to Task 2 of Task 1 precentral or central manipulations at short SOAs. The CCS model also predicts that Task 1 response times increase with decreasing SOA. The model is a viable alternative to the central bottleneck model.

Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesBottleneckTask (project management)Computer scienceStimulus (psychology)Cognitive psychologyPsychologyEngineering

MeSH terms

HumansModels, PsychologicalRefractory Period, Psychological
Citations
592
FWCI
8.09
field-weighted impact
References
33
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The role of executive function and attention in gait
Movement Disorders · 2007 · 2,087 citations
References
Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.
Psychological Bulletin · 1994 · 3,028 citations
Attention and Effort
The American Journal of Psychology · 1975 · 7,045 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. · Scinovex