review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Is increased time to diagnosis and treatment in symptomatic cancer associated with poorer outcomes? Systematic review
British Journal of Cancer · 2015 · Vol. 112(S1) · pp. S92–S107
Richard D Neal✉(Bangor University)Puvan Tharmanathan(University of York)B France(Bangor University)N Din(Bangor University)S Cotton(Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board)Julia Fallon‐Ferguson(University of Western Australia)William Hamilton(University of Exeter)Annie Hendry(Bangor University)Maggie Hendry(Bangor University)Ruth Lewis(University of York)Una Macleod(Hull York Medical School)Elizabeth Mitchell(University of Leeds)Mary Pickett(Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board)Teena Rai(Bangor University)Katie Shaw(University of Western Australia)N Stuart(Bangor University)Marie Louise Tørring(Aarhus University)Clare Wilkinson(Bangor University)Briony Williams(University of Western Australia)Nia Williams(Bangor University)Jon Emery(University of Melbourne)
Abstract
This is the first review encompassing many cancer types, and we have demonstrated those cancers in which more evidence of an association between shorter times to diagnosis and more favourable outcomes exists, and where it is lacking. We believe that it is reasonable to assume that efforts to expedite the diagnosis of symptomatic cancer are likely to have benefits for patients in terms of improved survival, earlier-stage diagnosis and improved quality of life, although these benefits vary between cancers.
Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionColorectal and Anal CarcinomasMedicineCancerMEDLINEOncologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineBiology
MeSH terms
HumansNeoplasmsPrognosisDelayed DiagnosisTime-to-Treatment
Funding
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
- Public Health Wales
- Cancer Research UK
Citations
974
FWCI
24.86
field-weighted impact
References
215
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ · 2020 · 1,619 citations
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study
The Lancet Oncology · 2020 · 1,847 citations
References
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2009 · 37,606 citations
Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2013 · 3,036 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ · 2009 · 82,871 citations
The Aarhus statement: improving design and reporting of studies on early cancer diagnosis
British Journal of Cancer · 2012 · 739 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · 19,782 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
