articleTop 1% cited

REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ON FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS

The Journal of Urology · 2000 · Vol. 163(3) · pp. 888–893

Rosemary Basson✉(University of British Columbia)Jennifer R. Berman(University of British Columbia)Arthur L. Burnett(University of British Columbia)Leonard R. Derogatis(University of British Columbia)David M. Ferguson(University of British Columbia)Jean L. Fourcroy(University of British Columbia)Irwin Goldstein(University of British Columbia)Alessandra Graziottin(University of British Columbia)Julia R. Heiman(University of British Columbia)Ellen Laan(University of British Columbia)Sandra R. Leiblum(University of British Columbia)Harin Padma-Nathan(University of British Columbia)Raymond C. Rosen(University of British Columbia)K. B. Segraves(University of British Columbia)Robert Segraves(University of British Columbia)Ridwan Shabsigh(University of British Columbia)Marcalee Sipski(University of British Columbia)Gorm Wagner(University of British Columbia)Beverly Whipple(University of British Columbia)

View via DOI Publisher page

Abstract

We recommend use of the new female sexual dysfunction diagnostic and classification system based on physiological as well as psychological pathophysiologies, and a personal distress criterion for most diagnostic categories.

Sexual function and dysfunction studies Sexual Differentiation and Disorders Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsMedicineConsensus conferenceWashington ConsensusIntensive care medicineFamily medicineInternal medicineLaw