Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

A proposed model membrane and test method for microneedle insertion studies

International Journal of Pharmaceutics · 2014 · Vol. 472(1-2) · pp. 65–73
Eneko LarrañetaJessica MooreEva M. Vicente‐PérezPatricia González‐VázquezRebecca E. M. LuttonA. David WoolfsonRyan F. Donnelly

Abstract

A commercial polymeric film (Parafilm M(®), a blend of a hydrocarbon wax and a polyolefin) was evaluated as a model membrane for microneedle (MN) insertion studies. Polymeric MN arrays were inserted into Parafilm M(®) (PF) and also into excised neonatal porcine skin. Parafilm M(®) was folded before the insertions to closely approximate thickness of the excised skin. Insertion depths were evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT) using either a force applied by a Texture Analyser or by a group of human volunteers. The obtained insertion depths were, in general, slightly lower, especially for higher forces, for PF than for skin. However, this difference was not a large, being less than the 10% of the needle length. Therefore, all these data indicate that this model membrane could be a good alternative to biological tissue for MN insertion studies. As an alternative method to OCT, light microscopy was used to evaluate the insertion depths of MN in the model membrane. This provided a rapid, simple method to compare different MN formulations. The use of Parafilm M(®), in conjunction with a standardised force/time profile applied by a Texture Analyser, could provide the basis for a rapid MN quality control test suitable for in-process use. It could also be used as a comparative test of insertion efficiency between candidate MN formulations.

Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryOcular Surface and Contact LensOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsMembraneBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceChromatographyChemistryMedicine

MeSH terms

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornMembranes, ArtificialMicroinjectionsNeedlesParaffinSkinSwine

Funding

  • Wellcome
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Citations
563
FWCI
5.04
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
96%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · 2003 · 1,456 citations
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · 2012 · 1,661 citations
Microfabricated Microneedles: A Novel Approach to Transdermal Drug Delivery
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · 1998 · 1,309 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.