Scinovex
article

Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases

Pain · 1983 · Vol. 17(2) · pp. 197–210
Randall L. DautCharles S. CleelandRandall C. Flanery

Abstract

This paper reports the development of a self-report instrument designed to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. It is argued that issues of reliability and validity should be considered for every pain questionnaire. Most research on measures of pain examine reliability to the relative neglect of validity concerns. The Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire (BPQ) is evaluated with regard to both reliability and validity. Data from patients with cancer at 4 primary sites and from patients with rheumatoid arthritis suggest that the BPQ is sufficiently reliable and valid for research purposes. Additional methodological and theoretical issues related to validity are discussed, and the need for continuing evaluation of the BPQ and other measures of clinical pain is stressed.

Pain Management and Opioid UseCancer survivorship and careOral health in cancer treatmentReliability (semiconductor)NeglectCancer painPhysical therapyValidityMedicineClinical psychologyPsychologyCancerPsychometrics

MeSH terms

AdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainProstatic NeoplasmsSurveys and Questionnaires

Funding

  • National Cancer Institute
Citations
1,578
FWCI
2.75
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
89%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Pain measurement: an overview
Pain · 1985 · 1,086 citations
Assessment of pain
British Journal of Anaesthesia · 2008 · 1,968 citations
References
On the Language of Pain
Anesthesiology · 1971 · 929 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.