Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

<b>CT Evaluation of the Response of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Imatinib Mesylate Treatment:</b> A Quantitative Analysis Correlated with FDG PET Findings

American Journal of Roentgenology · 2004 · Vol. 183(6) · pp. 1619–1628
Haesun ChoiC CharnsangavejSilvana de Castro FariaEric P. TammRobert S. BenjaminMarcella M. JohnsonHomer A. MacapinlacDonald A. Podoloff

Abstract

FDG PET is sensitive and specific for evaluating tumor response but cannot be used in patients whose baseline FDG PET results are negative for tumors. Although subjective evaluation was a better indicator of treatment response than was tumor density alone, the tumor density measurement is a good indicator and provides a reliable quantitative means of monitoring the tumor. RECIST, using only tumor size, was unreliable for monitoring GISTs during the early stage of imatinib mesylate treatment.

Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and TreatmentGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesSoft tissue tumor case studiesMedicineImatinib mesylateResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsStromal tumorStandardized uptake valueNuclear medicineProgressive diseaseInternal medicineStromal cellImatinib

MeSH terms

Imatinib MesylateAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesPyrimidinesRadionuclide ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed
Citations
455
FWCI
12.00
field-weighted impact
References
19
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.