Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Cloudnet

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2007 · Vol. 88(6) · pp. 883–898
A. J. IllingworthRobin J. HoganEwan O’ConnorDominique BouniolM. E. BrooksJ. DelanoéDavid P. DonovanJ.D. EastmentNicolas GaussiatJ.W.F. GoddardMartial HaeffelinH. Klein BaltinkOleg A. KrasnovJacques PelonJean‐Marcel PiriouAlain ProtatH.W.J. RusschenbergAxel SeifertAdrian M. TompkinsGerd‐Jan van ZadelhoffF. VinitUlrika WillénDamian R. WilsonC. L. Wrench

Abstract

The Cloudnet project aims to provide a systematic evaluation of clouds in forecast and climate models by comparing the model output with continuous ground-based observations of the vertical profiles of cloud properties. In the models, the properties of clouds are simplified and expressed in terms of the fraction of the model grid box, which is filled with cloud, together with the liquid and ice water content of the clouds. These models must get the clouds right if they are to correctly represent both their radiative properties and their key role in the production of precipitation, but there are few observations of the vertical profiles of the cloud properties that show whether or not they are successful. Cloud profiles derived from cloud radars, ceilometers, and dual-frequency microwave radiometers operated at three sites in France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom for several years have been compared with the clouds in seven European models. The advantage of this continuous appraisal is that the feedback on how new versions of models are performing is provided in quasi-real time, as opposed to the much longer time scale needed for in-depth analysis of complex field studies. Here, two occasions are identified when the introduction of new versions of the ECMWF and Météo-France models leads to an immediate improvement in the representation of the clouds and also provides statistics on the performance of the seven models. The Cloudnet analysis scheme is currently being expanded to include sites outside Europe and further operational forecasting and climate models.

Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsPrecipitation Measurement and AnalysisCloud computingEnvironmental scienceLiquid water contentMeteorologyCloud fractionGridPrecipitationClimate modelComputer scienceRemote sensing

Funding

  • Sight Research UK
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Citations
773
FWCI
19.66
field-weighted impact
References
51
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
THE CLOUDSAT MISSION AND THE A-TRAIN
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2002 · 2,218 citations
The CALIPSO mission: spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003 · 807 citations
Representation of Clouds in Large-Scale Models
Monthly Weather Review · 1993 · 1,006 citations
ISCCP Cloud Data Products
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 1991 · 1,589 citations
A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 1990 · 897 citations
A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 1999 · 680 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Cloudnet · Scinovex