Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia

Materials · 2015 · Vol. 8(3) · pp. 932–958
Reham OsmanMichael V. Swain

Abstract

The goal of the current publication is to provide a comprehensive literature review on the topic of dental implant materials. The following paper focuses on conventional titanium implants and more recently introduced and increasingly popular zirconia implants. Major subtopics include the material science and the clinical considerations involving both implant materials and the influence of their physical properties on the treatment outcome. Titanium remains the gold standard for the fabrication of oral implants, even though sensitivity does occur, though its clinical relevance is not yet clear. Zirconia implants may prove to be promising in the future; however, further <i>in vitro</i> and well-designed <i>in vivo</i> clinical studies are needed before such a recommendation can be made. Special considerations and technical experience are needed when dealing with zirconia implants to minimize the incidence of mechanical failure.

Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsDental materials and restorationsCubic zirconiaTitaniumDental implantImplantDentistryMaterials scienceGold standard (test)MedicineMetallurgySurgery

Funding

  • University of Otago
Citations
554
FWCI
43.88
field-weighted impact
References
184
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?
Biomaterials · 2005 · 1,181 citations
Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys
Materials Science and Engineering A · 1998 · 2,096 citations
Environmental degradation of zirconia ceramics
Journal of the European Ceramic Society · 1995 · 451 citations
Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial
Biomaterials · 1999 · 2,766 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.