articleTop 10% cited
Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population‐based birthweight standards
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2001 · Vol. 108(8) · pp. 830–834
Britt Clausson✉(Karolinska Institutet)Jason Gardosi(Perinatal Institute)André Francis(Perinatal Institute)Sven Cnattingius(Karolinska Institutet)
Abstract
Compared with the population-based birthweight standard, a customised birthweight standard increases identification of fetuses at risk of stillbirth, neonatal death and Apgar score under 4 at 5 minutes, probably due to improved identification of fetal growth restriction.
Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementOutcome (game theory)ObstetricsPopulationMedicinePerinatal mortalityPregnancyEconomicsBiologyFetusEnvironmental health
MeSH terms
AdultApgar ScoreFemaleFetal DeathHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMaternal AgePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReference StandardsRisk FactorsSwedenCohort StudiesBody Mass Index
Citations
471
FWCI
11.79
field-weighted impact
References
13
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.