Tortuosity in Porous Media: A Critical Review

Abstract

The concept of tortuosity is used to characterize the structure of porous media, to estimate their electrical and hydraulic conductivity, and to study the travel time and length for tracer dispersion, but different types of tortuosity—geometric, hydraulic, electrical, and diffusive—have been used essentially interchangeably in the literature. Here, we critically review the tortuosity models developed empirically, analytically, and numerically for flow in both saturated and unsaturated porous media. We emphasize that the proposed tortuosity models are distinct and thus may not be used interchangeably. Given the variety of models that have been developed, and the sharp differences between some of them, no consensus has emerged unifying the models in a coherent way. Related treatments of tortuosity are found in the literature on porous catalysts. In such materials, nonlinear reactions ordinarily accompany transport, and the effective diffusivity within the pore space in the presence of the reactions is distinct from the one in their absence. Thus, because tortuosity may be defined as the ratio of the effective diffusivities in the bulk material and within the pore space, a careful treatment of tortuosity may need to distinguish between transport with and without reactions. This complication is ultimately relevant to soils as well, because bioremediation and biodegradation in soils are always accompanied by nonlinear reactions. Common models of tortuosity include both logarithmic functions and power laws. In many cases, the differences between the logarithmic and power-law phenomenologies are not great, but power laws can usually be reconciled with percolation concepts. Invoking percolation theory provides both insight into the origin of the power functions and a framework for understanding differences between tortuosity models.