Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights

Acta Paediatrica · 1996 · Vol. 85(7) · pp. 843–848
K. MaršálP‐H. PerssonTorben LarsenHans LiljaAnders SelbingBeenish I. Sultan

Abstract

Available standard intrauterine growth curves based on birthweights underestimate foetal growth in preterm period. New growth curves are presented based on data from four Scandinavian centres for 759 ultrasonically estimated foetal weights in 86 uncomplicated pregnancies. Mean weight of boys exceeded that of girls by 2-3%. A uniform SD value of 12% of the mean weight was adopted for the standard curves as the true SD varied non-systematically between 9.1 and 12.4%. Applied to an unselected population of 8663 singleton births, before 210 days of gestation, 32% of birthweights were classified as small-for-gestational age (SGA; i.e. below mean - 2 SD); the corresponding figures were 11.1% for gestational ages between 210 and 258 days, and 2.6% for ages of 259 days or longer. The new growth curves reveal better the true distribution of SGA foetuses and neonates, and are suggested for use in perinatological practice.

Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementMedicineGestational ageGestationSingletonObstetricsBirth weightGrowth curve (statistics)Small for gestational agePopulationPregnancy

MeSH terms

AnthropometryBirth WeightBody WeightDenmarkFemaleEmbryonic and Fetal DevelopmentGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyReference ValuesRegression AnalysisSampling StudiesSweden
Citations
1,837
FWCI
23.55
field-weighted impact
References
15
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
THE ASSESSMENT OF FETAL GROWTH
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 1968 · 756 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.