Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.

Journal of Applied Psychology · 1993 · Vol. 78(2) · pp. 306–309

Abstract

Schmidt and Hunter (1989) critiqued the within-group interrater reliability statistic (r wg ) described by James, Demaree, and Wolf (1984). Kozlowski and Hattrup (1992) responded to the Schmidt and Hunter critique and argued that r wg is a suitable index of interrater agreement. This article focuses on the interpretation of r wg as a measure of agreement among judges' ratings of a single target. A new derivation of r wg is given that underscores this interpretation

Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementMulti-Criteria Decision MakingPsychometric Methodologies and TestingInter-rater reliabilityPsychologyGroup (periodic table)AgreementClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyRating scale
Citations
2,209
FWCI
12.34
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.
Journal of Applied Psychology · 1984 · 4,618 citations
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychological Bulletin · 1979 · 22,750 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.