Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

NATURE RESERVES: DO THEY CAPTURE THE FULL RANGE OF AMERICA'S BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY?

Ecological Applications · 2001 · Vol. 11(4) · pp. 999–1007
James M. ScottFrank W. DavisR. Gavin McGhieR. Gerald WrightCraig GrovesJohn E. Estes

Abstract

Less than 6% of the coterminous United States is in nature reserves. Assessment of the occurrence of nature reserves across ranges of elevation and soil productivity classes indicates that nature reserves are most frequently found at higher elevations and on less productive soils. The distribution of plants and animals suggests that the greatest number of species is found at lower elevations. A preliminary assessment of the occurrence of mapped land cover types indicates that ∼60% of mapped cover types have <10% of their area in nature reserves. Land ownership patterns show that areas of lower elevation and more productive soils are most often privately owned and already extensively converted to urban and agricultural uses. Thus any effort to establish a system of nature reserves that captures the full geographical and ecological range of cover types and species must fully engage the private sector. For reprints of this Invited Feature, see footnote 1, p. 945.

Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesRangeland and Wildlife ManagementBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesNature reserveEcologyRange (aeronautics)Elevation (ballistics)ProductivityLand coverDiversity (politics)GeographyAgricultureBiodiversity
Citations
561
FWCI
22.36
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Human Appropriation of the Products of Photosynthesis
BioScience · 1986 · 1,513 citations
When Are Peripheral Populations Valuable for Conservation?
Conservation Biology · 1995 · 1,056 citations
Related articles
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.