Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison

Applied Optics · 1982 · Vol. 21(15) · pp. 2758–2758
James R. Fienup

Abstract

Iterative algorithms for phase retrieval from intensity data are compared to gradient search methods. Both the problem of phase retrieval from two intensity measurements (in electron microscopy or wave front sensing) and the problem of phase retrieval from a single intensity measurement plus a non-negativity constraint (in astronomy) are considered, with emphasis on the latter. It is shown that both the error-reduction algorithm for the problem of a single intensity measurement and the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm for the problem of two intensity measurements converge. The error-reduction algorithm is also shown to be closely related to the steepest-descent method. Other algorithms, including the input-output algorithm and the conjugate-gradient method, are shown to converge in practice much faster than the error-reduction algorithm. Examples are shown.

Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsPhase retrievalAlgorithmGradient descentReduction (mathematics)Computer sciencePhase (matter)Conjugate gradient methodIntensity (physics)OpticsMathematics
Citations
5,529
FWCI
24.51
field-weighted impact
References
24
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The Fourier Transform and Its Applications
American Journal of Physics · 1966 · 5,454 citations
On the ambiguity of the image reconstruction problem
Optics Communications · 1979 · 325 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison · Scinovex