articleTop 1% cited

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer

Radiology · 2004 · Vol. 233(3) · pp. 830–849

Wendie A. Berg✉(American College of Radiology)L Junquera Gutierrez(American College of Radiology)Moriel NessAiver(American College of Radiology)W. Bradford Carter(American College of Radiology)Mythreyi BhargavanRebecca S. Lewis(American College of Radiology)Olga B. Ioffe(American College of Radiology)

View via DOI Publisher page

Abstract

In nonfatty breasts, US and MR imaging were more sensitive than mammography for invasive cancer, but both MR imaging and US involved risk of overestimation of tumor extent. Combined mammography, clinical examination, and MR imaging were more sensitive than any other individual test or combination of tests.

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies Breast Lesions and Carcinomas MRI in cancer diagnosisMedicineMammographyBreast cancerDuctal carcinomaRadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingInvasive lobular carcinomaPhysical examinationCancerInvasive ductal carcinoma

MeSH terms

Adipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituContrast MediaFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle Aged

Citations

1,416

FWCI

18.94

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

100%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

Sonographic Characterization of breast masses with pathological correlation