Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators

The Review of Economic Studies · 2004 · Vol. 72(1) · pp. 1–19
Alberto Abadie

Abstract

The difference-in-differences (DID) estimator is one of the most popular tools for applied research in economics to evaluate the effects of public interventions and other treatments of interest on some relevant outcome variables. However, it is well known that the DID estimator is based on strong identifying assumptions. In particular, the conventional DID estimator requires that, in the absence of the treatment, the average outcomes for the treated and control groups would have followed parallel paths over time. This assumption may be implausible if pre-treatment characteristics that are thought to be associated with the dynamics of the outcome variable are unbalanced between the treated and the untreated. That would be the case, for example, if selection for treatment is influenced by individual-transitory shocks on past outcomes (Ashenfelter's dip). This article considers the case in which differences in observed characteristics create non-parallel outcome dynamics between treated and controls. It is shown that, in such a case, a simple two-step strategy can be used to estimate the average effect of the treatment for the treated. In addition, the estimation framework proposed in this article allows the use of covariates to describe how the average effect of the treatment varies with changes in observed characteristics. Copyright 2005, Wiley-Blackwell.

Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsEstimatorCovariateOutcome (game theory)EconometricsEconomicsAverage treatment effectVariable (mathematics)Control variableTreatment effectEstimation
Citations
2,209
FWCI
19.70
field-weighted impact
References
60
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
Journal of Econometrics · 2020 · 1,413 citations
Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data
The Review of Economics and Statistics · 2007 · 1,325 citations
How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2004 · 10,364 citations
How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?
Journal of Financial Economics · 2022 · 2,725 citations
A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends
The Review of Economic Studies · 2023 · 1,021 citations
References
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
Journal of Educational Psychology · 1974 · 9,316 citations
Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings
The Review of Economics and Statistics · 1978 · 1,512 citations
Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs
The Review of Economics and Statistics · 1985 · 1,011 citations
Principles of mathematical analysis
Journal of the Franklin Institute · 1953 · 4,038 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.