Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Statistical Field Significance and its Determination by Monte Carlo Techniques

Monthly Weather Review · 1983 · Vol. 111(1) · pp. 46–59
Robert E. LivezeyW. Y. Chen

Abstract

The effects of number and interdependence in evaluating the collective significance of finite sets of statistics are frequently non-trivial, especially for spatial networks of time-averaged meteorological data. These effects can be taken into account in two steps: By first prescreening for significance assuming data independence and then, if necessary, by taking into consideration dependence through the use of estimated effective degrees of freedom and the binomial distribution or, failing that, Monte Carlo simulation. Seasonal averages of 700 mb height data are used to illustrate the problem and to demonstrate how the data set properties are taken into account. Papers by Hancock and Yarger (1979), Nastrom and Belmont (1980) and Williams (1980) are critically examined in light of these considerations and Monte Carlo strategies for clarification of ambiguities suggested.

Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisMonte Carlo methodIndependence (probability theory)Statistical physicsField (mathematics)Negative binomial distributionData setSet (abstract data type)StatisticsComputer scienceMathematics
Citations
1,163
FWCI
54.33
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Detection of hydrologic trends and variability
Journal of Hydrology · 2002 · 1,166 citations
Choice of South Asian Summer Monsoon Indices
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 1999 · 818 citations
Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2006 · 4,406 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.